Difference between revisions of "Talk:Constitution"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "I'd like to dispute Constitution being primarily good for those who rely on Armour. Especially if you have a low chance of being hit without any other evasion, you need high h...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Especially if you have a low chance of being hit without any other evasion, you need high hp until you get a good shield. | Especially if you have a low chance of being hit without any other evasion, you need high hp until you get a good shield. | ||
An armour character, on the other hand, can become so immune to damage he doesn't necessarily rely only on hitpoints. --[[User:UnLimiTeD|UnLimiTeD]] ([[User talk:UnLimiTeD|talk]]) 12:03, 9 April 2015 (CDT) | An armour character, on the other hand, can become so immune to damage he doesn't necessarily rely only on hitpoints. --[[User:UnLimiTeD|UnLimiTeD]] ([[User talk:UnLimiTeD|talk]]) 12:03, 9 April 2015 (CDT) | ||
| + | Furthermore, I'd like to raise the question how much hp exactly one gets from Constitution. I might test that in the near future.--[[User:UnLimiTeD|UnLimiTeD]] ([[User talk:UnLimiTeD|talk]]) 12:05, 9 April 2015 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:05, 9 April 2015
I'd like to dispute Constitution being primarily good for those who rely on Armour. Especially if you have a low chance of being hit without any other evasion, you need high hp until you get a good shield. An armour character, on the other hand, can become so immune to damage he doesn't necessarily rely only on hitpoints. --UnLimiTeD (talk) 12:03, 9 April 2015 (CDT) Furthermore, I'd like to raise the question how much hp exactly one gets from Constitution. I might test that in the near future.--UnLimiTeD (talk) 12:05, 9 April 2015 (CDT)